Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Day 6: Tuesday October 28 (Andrew James Paterson)

Photo of Francis Arguin (above) by Henry Chan.
Photo of Jason Lim (below) by Henry Chan.

Andrew James Paterson

Late in the afternoon, I found myself with idle time so I decided to check in on the Creative Residents working out of Toronto Free Gallery. Chaw El Thein’s mural - Quiet River - had been extended much further than what I had briefly glimpsed at late last week. A row of Burmese monks at the top of the mural gave way to monks with the same faces and tops of bodies, but without legs. Chaw informed me that quite a few Burmese people living in Toronto and also many citizens of the Bloor-Lansdowne neighbourhood had entered the Free Gallery space and conversed with her as she worked on her mural. Most of the Burmese visitors had responded to an advertised notice, and Chaw was pleased by the range of respondents. Chaw El Thein will be making a presentation next Saturday afternoon.

Meanwhile, Glenn Lewis was choosing appropriate music for his upcoming presentation next Saturday afternoon. He had assembled four bags of litter or trash or whatever that he had collected during his two walking excursions previously this week. Lewis had thoughtfully left a note indicating that his garbage was not garbage.

After a goat roti in the nearby Vena Restaurant, I headed down to Xpace. The first performer of the evening was Quebecois artist Francis Arguin, whose presentation was titled Introduction to the body-orchestra. And it was an orchestral performance, although alternatively offhanded and then intense in its tone. His set was simple - a chair, a bottle containing water, a Styrofoam cup, and a non-descript bag containing probably something(s) mysterious. He sipped water from the cup, and then began slowly moving sideways in stage rather stiffly, not like a fluid dancer. He also began making motorific noises, like a car idling or waiting to make a move. He pointed a lot and used the pointing and the growling to create broken rhythms.

Photos of Francis Arguin by Henry Chan.

Then he reached into the bag, produced clear plastic tape (a commonplace in many performances) and some bug-eyed blue cardboard-like sunglasses (no glass). He sat down and began tapping his feet very speedily - creating express train rhythms. He toyed with his shirt, while I noticed that he was wearing yellow socks. He announced that his name was Francis, and that he might try to kill his name. Francis, not Francois or Frank. He announced that his name is Le Petit Shirt That He Wears. He took his shirt off revealing a red T-shirt was the letters spelling FRANCIS. Another identical shirt underneath also spelled his first name. Another not quite identical shirt said his name was FRINCAS. Not a clever anagram, but a reject typo. He picked up a can of something that he shook. It was paint.

Photo of Francis Arguin by Henry Chan.

Arguin held up cardboard sheets in which he had made holes resembling shapes. He held the first on against his white T-shirt and voila a table. Then he shook a can of paint which was revealed as being red. He’d pile incongruous objects on top of each other on top of the table (electric guitar, milk bottle, a river, an umbrella, and many more). He made a non pop-art T-shirt, which was a singular original. It could become a multiple if screened, but it could never be painted exactly the same way twice.

Photo of Francis Arguin by Henry Chan:

Another colour was necessary, so he produced a yellow object that may have been a fan or a hanger or a series of pyramids. He dropped little flying objects from this hanger, labelling them as things that fly from the sky. “Snow, bomb, rain, birdshit” He produced a clear plastic top and matches, lighting the martch, securing it with his left baby-finger nail, and then drawing an arc. He dropped the match onto the floor (oh dear, more fire), rolled up his trouser legs, sat back to audience with his feet on red cushions, and began slowly moving the contraption backwards. As he cleared a path through the cenre of the suinece, it became clear that this was a durational act that would not be followed or succeeded. And it was. Arguin had linked four of five or six movements into some sort of site, if not a symphony. The performance was not bombastic; it was on the verge of being precarious.

The second performer of the evening (main floor, no basement-dwellers tonight) was Singapore-based Jason Lim’s Last Drop. Sure enough, he had a series of clear glasses carefully laid sideways on the floor, with two bottles of clear water. He also had a pile of dessert-sized plates, and a leafless small tree. He selected four glasses, and placed them under the legs of the table. Lim stood several of the other glasses vertically, and began mounting the glasses into a quasi-pyramid. Two layers of glass on glass, and then one on the top. He poured water into the top glass and into those below it - without spillage. Almost magical.

Photos of Jason Lim by Henry Chan.

He moved the tree over beside the chair area, and lit a match. He produced small stickish objects that he lit and set burinig. They were odourless - they weren’t cigarettes or candles and, if they were incense, then they sure didn’t smell like any variety on the market. The sticklike objects were spread arounhd the tree - smoking and occasionally flaring. He grabed the clear tape and wrapped it around the tree and the chair, making almost an anti-Christmas sculpture for the almost deseted living room.
Photo of Jason Lim by Henry Chan.

Now he picked up the plates that had been waiting for him. He begain stacking plate on top of glass on top of plate, while using full glasses of water. He built an eight glass-high tower and it was perfectly balanced and secure.Then he played magician again with a full glass of water. He’d hold the glass until it seemed to slip out of his hand from pressure of duration, but then catch it safely. He repeated this gesture sixteen times. Eight glass tower plus sixteen safe catches makes twenty-four. Then he played close-up basketball with the remaining glasses, dropping them into each other with only minimal chipping. There was a lot of water to mop up on the floor, but negligible broken glass. Very impressive. Lin stated in the festival catalogue that Last Drop was intended to invoke sound and silence, fullness, and emptiness. The performance did indeed involve refurbishing and draining, and sound always threatened to break into the silence. But this performer retained control - accidents were never part of the equation.

Photos of Nicola Frangione by Henry Chan.

The final performer of the evening was Nicola Frangione from Monza, Italy. Frangione performs Voice in Movement - performance poetry or what some artists describe as “art dramaturgy”. He did not simply stand and read, he used his entire body. His words and his body were in beautiful synchronization - it was not as if one needed to cue the other. And he used pre-recorded music to set rhythms for his movements, his vocailizations, and the striking black and white images projected to his left. Roll text of translated excerpts segued into complex visuals. These images were of musical stanzas, of scientic images, and of words themselves as pictures, but they would become deliriously abstract in tandem with his hands and hips and feet. Nicola Frangione is a man with an idiosyncratic sense of rhythm and thus he understands the beauty of both screen-saving and auto-oscillation. Make a sound, make a picture, let it generate and regenerate and chase its own tail many times over. The fourth composition was almost eponymous with the poetic presentation: “vocecevovodce”. Voice this voice this voice etcetera - it consisted of sound alliterations of the word “voce “(voice!); “while poetry is bouncing, the poet is jumping.” And the projected images were mantric, and all in black and white. Colour was unnecessary.

Photo of Nicola Frangione by Henry Chan.

In the reference sheet that the artist thoughtfully had distributed to the audience, Frangione’s second composition “Ittoosang” is posited as a rather Cageian exercise. It is described as a piece for the listener, who is given a series of instructions to follow for a specific duration. Except…the sixth command states for “that pleasure’s sake you can avoid following these instructions. Frangione concludes his paragraph on this second piece of the evening with the following zinger:

“Instructions are always useful for those who write them while they are hardly useful for those who follow them.” Zen, or anti-Zen?

Nicola Frangione’s set was brief and fulfilling - he could have continued for a good deal longer and maintained both surprise and beauty. Voice in Movement was a multi-media performance, in the best senses of that overburdened and frequently reductive description.


my bed said said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
my bed said said...

i'm not sure if we were at the same performance... because i remember an obscene amount of spillage falling away from the pyramid of glasses produced by Lim as he poured the water over them, and the sticks he lit and threw to the floor were indeed cigarettes wrapped in matches. the delayed flaring was due to the fact that it took time for the cigarette to burn and eventually ignite the matches, which were placed slightly lower along the cigarette's shaft.

I rather thought the most coherent and impressive of the night was Francis Arguin's piece. His words while using those seemingly odd gestures and colourful props are extremely important to its coherence. He mentioned labels, and that what is categorized as part of the world can be likened to the objects touching the table on his t-shirt (what touches the table is part of the world). the objects were arbitrary, yes, but to show that not all things can be labeled. indeed, things that are not in contact with the world (or the table) should still be included in one's experience of reality...for example, birdshit, the sun, god, bombs... things that cannot be directly perceived or categorized are still valid as experiences... that's what i got from it.

7a*11d International Festival of Performance Art said...

Cecilia, you were probably right about the amount of water spilled, but I remember the performance as being so controlled that I didn't find anything messy. And you are right about the sticks being cigarettes in matches. I stand corrected, so thank you.

my bed said said...

The amount of control in the performance was impressive, and I agree with you, it didn't amount to feeling messy at all. I thought the puddle of water slowly creeping toward the crowd for the duration of the performance was nice, whether planned or unplanned.